3.1 Student Early Intervention Process(SEIP)
The SEIP is intended to identify students who are demonstrating difficulty meeting the behavior, knowledge and skills defined for courses in their curricular year and/or the administrative responsibilities and professional behaviors expected of a medical student in the curriculum. (See examples below).
The Student Early Intervention Committee (SEIC) will determine if a student is at risk for not progressing successfully through the curriculum and provide recommendations forrequired tutoring, modifications of student schedules, meeting with Academic Enhancement Office specialists, meeting with an Associate Dean, advisor or coach and/or other actions such as referral to the Student Evaluation and Promotion Committee (SEPC). All recommendations are intended to provide additional support to ensure successful progression through the curriculum and are subject to review and approval by the Student Evaluation and Promotion Committee (SEPC) for final disposition. Information on the students progress may be shared with course and clerkship directors to provide support for the student.
In the preclerkship phase, the SEIC is comprised of the course directors and course managers for that academic year, the Associate Dean for Medical Education (ADME), Associate Dean for Student Affairs (ADSA) or designee and Academic Enhancement Office (AEO) representative. In the clerkship phase, the SEIC is comprised of the Clerkship directors for that academic year, the ADME, and the ADSA or designee. In each phase of the curriculum, the SEIC meets quarterly and reviews all students. Examples of reasons SEIC will refer directly to SEPC include
- Repeated lapses in meeting course expectations (i.e attendance, course assignments) despite notification by course director
- Pattern of concern in performance including marginal performance on end of year assessments
- Repeated lapses in attendance to mandatory sessions
- Repeated lapses in responding to communication, which may include but not limited to correspondences from administrators, course directors and/or deans
- Two clerkship exam failures or one clinical failure in the clerkship or post clerkship phase
The process of referral from SEIC to the SEPC is as follows:
- After students of concern are identified by SEIC, the ADME or designee emails SAO Senior Policy Officer with the list of names for the SEPC meeting, including name of student, year and reason for SEPC referral.
- The ADSA and ADME discuss optimal timing for the student’s appearance at the SEPC (which meeting, taking into account their academic schedule, scheduled exams, personal concerns and other).
- The Senior Policy Officer in the SAO notifies the students via email that they have been placed on the SEPC agenda by the SEIC at least seven business days prior to the SEPC meeting, including the reason for the referral to the SEPC.
3.2 Student Evaluation of Professionalism:
Professionalism is a core competency and critical component of the student’s overall performance in medical school and lapses in such may be reported by faculty, at their discretion. Initial episodes of unprofessional behavior should be addressed as a learning opportunity and with a sole focus on remediation. Additional details describing the student code of conduct and the mechanism for reporting as well as potential consequences of unprofessional behavior are available at: https://www.bumc.bu.edu/camed/faculty/medical-student-disciplinary-code.
Egregious and/or repeated lapses in professional conduct related to either clinical or course/clerkship responsibilities, may require further action, including discussion by appropriate SEIC, referral to Physician Health Services the Disciplinary Committee or the SEPC, with formal monitoring and documentation of progress. Clear communication between student and supervising faculty is of paramount importance, and prompt and specific feedback must be shared directly with the student. The end goal of all interventions regarding professional conduct is to foster and support the student’s development as a physician. Students must be directly informed of the behavior of concern, as close to the event as possible, by the individual who observed the unprofessional behavior. Students must have the opportunity to respond to concerns and participate in the development of remediation plans. Students are made aware of the expectations for professional conduct via:
- BU Medical Student Disciplinary Code of Academic and Professional Conduct, with particular emphasis to Section 1.2 and Appendix
- https://www.bumc.bu.edu/camed/faculty/medical-student-disciplinary-code/
- The Clerkship syllabi
- Section on Assessment and Grading (Clerkship Grading Policy-Professionalism),
- Section on Student-Professional Comportment;
- Association of American Medical Colleges
- EXHIBIT A: AAMC Teacher Learner Expectations
Recurrent concerns, even if deemed minor, identified via SEIC will be shared with the Student Affairs Office and the student’s core advisor for formative purposes. A referral to the Professionalism Resource Service should be strongly considered at this time. Professionalism concerns that did not result in referral to the SEPC but are determined to be significant by the clerkship director may be included in the student’s final clerkship narrative, but will not be reflected in the MSPE’s Professionalism Summary Section.
- If an SEIC identifes persistent lapses in professional behavior, as defined in the BU Code of Conduct, the SEIC will draft a Letter of Professionalism Concern (LOPC) and submit to the Medical Education Office. The student will also receive a copy of the LOPC
Format of the LOPC:
- Description of the concerning behavior with sufficient detail, including specific dates and locations, and the direct, specific and timely feedback provided to the student.
- LOPC sent to the SAO and AME for formative coaching and to the MEO for tracking.
- The SEIC will recommend a remediation plan with expected timeline for resolution or improvement, and follow up, if indicated.
Two or more LOPC in an academicyear results in referral to the SEPC for review and appropriate action, if any, or any single LOPC after the student has been previously referred to the SEPC for professionalism concerns will result in a return to the SEPC. A single LOPC, if triggered by a serious occurrence,can result in immediate reference to the SEPC
Professionalism concerns referred for review by the SEPC or the Disciplinary Committee are considered for inclusion in the Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) Professionalism section, as decided by the relevant committee, and may be reportable to relevant licensing boards.
3.3 Student Evaluation and Promotion Committee (SEPC)
The role of the Student Evaluation and Promotion Committee (SEPC) is to: 1) Consider student petitions for exception to school policy, 2) holistically review students who are not progressing successfully through the curriculum as expected and determine appropriate actions and 3) determine students’ readiness for promotion from one phase of the curriculum to the next or graduation.
Students will be referred to the SEPC directly or via the SEIC (described above) when there is lack of academic progress as defined by:
- Two or more module failures in the preclerkship phase of the curriculum.
- Failure of a remediation exam in the preclerkship phase.
- Fail in the End of Second Year Assessment (EOSYA) or End of Third Year Assessment(EOTYA)
- Students who were previously referred to the SEPC for academic or professionalism concerns and continue to demonstrate academic or professionalism difficulties
SEPC actions may include: recommendation for coaching, course work remediation, referral to Physician Health Services, referral to the Professionalism Referral Service, or disciplinary measures in accordance with applicable BU policies, including probation, suspension or dismissal. The SEPC meets monthly, or as necessary, to assess student readiness for evaluation and promotion for all four years of MD curriculum.
In accordance with BU policies and standards, the SEPC Evaluates a student’s academic and professional body of work, and makes recommendations in the best interest of academic progression and patient care;
SEPC acts upon written petitions from students who request an exception from school policies, reviews any student’s deficient performance and takes appropriate action; reviews students who may not meet the maximum time for BU degree completion; acts on requests for more than one re-examination, including end-of-clerkship exams.
3.3.1 Composition: The Composition of the SEPC is outlined in Article 5, Section G5 of the Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Bylaws on Faculty Central at: https://www.bumc.bu.edu/camed/faculty/faculty-handbook-and-school-bylaws/BU-bylaws/. A member of the SEPC who may have a conflict of interest in a particular case, such as having served as the student’s advisor, personal physician, or who is the Director of a Course/Clerkship being discussed, shall be recused from that student’s case.
3.3.2 Expedited Procedures: The SEPC Chair, after discussion with the Associate Dean of Student Affairs, may, in place of a formal meeting, email SEPC members to request approval of a student’s petition. SEPC members may approve the petition or request a meeting for resolution. In addition, the Associate Dean of Student Affairs may act on petitions from students who are in good academic standing without previous lapses in professional conduct or previous appearances before the SEPC. Such actions may include approving or denying petitions:
- for a Leave of Absence (LOA) for personal reasons;
- for a medical LOA;
- to enter a Modified curriculum; and
- to return to the curriculum from a LOA.
3.4 Student Generated Petitions: All student petitions must be prepared in consultation with the Associate Dean of Student Affairs (or designee) and must comply with the rules established by the Faculty of Medicine governing evaluation, grading, and promotion. All petitions must be typed, dated, signed, addressed to the SEPC, and received by the Office of Student Affairs at least three (3) business days before the scheduled meeting, unless an emergency prevents the student from complying with the deadline.
3.5 Procedure: The process of student referral to the SEPCs described below.
Process of referral to the SEPC:
All students on the SEPC’s agenda will be notified by email of the date, time, and location of the meeting at least THREE business days prior to the meeting. Students will be informed of the right to appear at the meeting and/or to submit a written statement to the SEPC. A student is not required, but is strongly encouraged, to attend the meeting. Within 24 hours of notification, a student must contact the appropriate Student Affairs officer to indicate whether or not the student will attend.
A student may bring a faculty advisor to the SEPC meeting. The advisor may present information to the SEPC, but will not participate in the general discussion about the student. Neither the student nor the advisor may be present during discussion, deliberation, or voting on the petition. Attorneys are not permitted to attend SEPC meetings.
Records and other documents relating to a student on the SEPC’s meeting agenda are available to Committee members prior to or at the meeting. Upon request, the student will have the opportunity to review in advance all documents to be submitted to the Committee. The student should have the opportunity to discuss adverse reports or evaluations with the appropriate Course Director, Clerkship Director, or Rotation Director before the SEPC acts on any reports or evaluations.
SEPC decisions are based upon the student’s entire academic and disciplinary record, if any, at the time of the meeting. SEPC actions may include, but are not limited to, requiring:
- to repeat the year
- a Decelerated Curriculum or a LOA
- probation for a defined period
- suspension
- Referral to Physician Health Services for further assessment or monitoring
- dismissal from BU.
The Chair will communicate the SEPC’s decision to the student in writing within 10 business days.
A student who plans to appeal the SEPC’s decision and notifies the Registrar in writing of their intent to appeal, may remain registered and participate in courses or clerkships during the appeals process (outlined below in Section XX), until they either miss the deadline for the next appeal or the Dean upholds the SEPC decision (even if an appeal is submitted to the Boston University Provost). No course or clerkship grades obtained during the appeal period will be recorded on the student’s medical school transcript if the SEPC decision is upheld. Students are responsible for tuition charges during this period.
3.6 Disciplinary Proceedings Reports to the SEPC: When a student in the MD or any of the combined MD programs has been found responsible for violating any disciplinary code of academic or professional conduct of the University, the SEPC shall be notified of the University’s final determination. The SEPC may review the final decision and the student’s complete academic record and may determine if other action is appropriate. If a student in a combined degree program is brought to the respective promotions or disciplinary committee, the SEPC shall be notified.
3.7 Committee Records Retention: Records of all SEPC meetings, as well as meetings of the Committee on Appeals, will be kept for six (6) years after the graduation or separation of the students on the agenda.