![\"Finnegan](\"\/ophthalmology\/files\/2012\/07\/finnbrain-322x300.jpg\" "\\"Finnegan")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Brain & Vision Research Lab<\/a> I work in Dr. Lucia Vaina<\/a>‘s lab (the Brain and Vision Research Lab<\/a> Calabro FJ, Vaina LM (in press). “Interaction of cortical networks mediating object motion Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM (2011). Different motion cues are used to estimate Calabro FJ, Soto-Faraco S, Vaina LM (2011). Acoustic facilitation of Calabro FJ, Rana KR, Vaina LM (2011). “Two mechanisms for optic flow and Calabro FJ, Vaina LM (2011). “A Computerized Perimeter for Assessing Modality-Specific Visual Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2011). Population Anisotropy in Area MT Explains a Perceptual Difference Between Near Vaina LM, Calabro FJ, Lin FH, Hamalainen MS. (2010). Long-range coupling of prefrontal cortex and visual Sikoglu EM, Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM. (2010). Integration mechanisms for heading perception. Seeing Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2006). Stereo motion transparency processing implements an ecological smoothness Calabro, FJ, Vaina, LM (2011). Detection of object motion during Vaina, LM, Rana, KD, Buonanno, F, Calabro, FJ, Hamalainen, M. (2011). Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2009). Modeling disparity tuning properties of MT for depth segmentation during motion Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2007) Scale changes provide an alternative means for coarse heading perception. Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2006) Perception of stereomotion coherence in the presence of planar or volumetric dynamic noise. Sikoglu EM, Beardsley SA, Calabro FJ, Vaina LM. (2006). Comparison of 2D and 3D ideal observers to Calabro FJ, Beardsley SA, Vaina LM. (2005). The contribution of disparity to motion contrast segmentation.
\nDepartment of Biomedical Engineering<\/a>
\n44 Cummington St, Room 336
\nBoston University
\nBoston, MA 02215
\nfcalabro@bu.edu<\/a>
\n(617) 353-9144<\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\nResearch interests<\/h2>\n
\nat Boston University). Our lab studies the neural processing of
\nvisual motion, including the perception of self- and object
\nmotion. We combine psychophysics, functional neuroimaging and
\ncomputational modeling to investigate how known properties of
\ncortical neurons give rise to complex visual perception.<\/p>\nPublications<\/h2>\n
\ndetection by moving observers.” Experimental Brain Research.<\/p>\n
\ntime-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories.
\nVision Research 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2378-85<\/p>\n
\nobject movement detection during self-motion. Proceedings of the Royal
\nSociety of London B. Sep 22;278(1719):2840-7. Abstract<\/a>, pdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\nscale change processing of looming.” Journal of Vision 11 (3): 5, 1-9.
\nAbstract<\/a>, pdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\nField Loss”. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2025-8 pdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\nand Far Disparity Motion Segmentation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105 (1):200-208.
\nAbstract<\/a>,
\npdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\n(MT) or polysensory (STP) cortical areas in motion perception. BIOMAG2010, IFBME Proceedings Series, Springer
\nVerlag IFBME.
\npdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\nand Perceiving, 23 (3): 197-221.
\nAbstract<\/a>, pdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\nconstraint. Perception, 35 (9), 1219-1232.
\nAbstract<\/a>,
\npdf<\/a><\/p>\nConference presentations<\/h2>\n
\nself-motion: psychophysics and neuronal substrate. Journal of Vision,
\n11(11):722. Abstract<\/a><\/p>\n
\nDeficit of temporal dynamics of detection of a moving object during
\negomotion in a
\nstroke patient: a psychophysical and MEG study. Journal of Vision,
\n11(11): 723. Abstract<\/a><\/p>\n
\nperception. Thirteenth International Conference on Cognitive and Neural Systems. Boston, Ma.
\nConference Information<\/a><\/p>\n
\nPerception 36 (Abstract Supplement). European Conference on Visual Perception. Arezzo, Italy.
\nAbstract<\/a><\/p>\n
\nJournal of Vision, 6(6): 624; doi:10.1167\/6.6.624
\nAbstract<\/a><\/p>\n
\ncharacterize heading perception with directional range noise. Journal of Vision, 6(6): 632;
\ndoi:10.1167\/6.6.632
\nAbstract<\/a><\/p>\n
\nJournal of Vision, 5(8), 726; doi:10.1167\/5.8.726.
\nAbstract<\/a><\/p>\n