{"id":10026,"date":"2011-04-05T15:03:03","date_gmt":"2011-04-05T19:03:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/?page_id=10026"},"modified":"2011-09-27T14:01:19","modified_gmt":"2011-09-27T18:01:19","slug":"best-practice-scenarios","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/students\/policies\/best-practice-scenarios\/","title":{"rendered":"Best Practice Scenarios"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><div class=\"bu_collapsible_container \" aria-live=\"polite\" data-customize-animation=\"false\"><h3 class=\"bu_collapsible\" aria-expanded=\"false\"tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\">Communicating with the Postdoc<\/h3><div class=\"bu_collapsible_section\" style=\"display: none;\"><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Susan has spent nearly two years exploring the research problem she chose<br \/>\nbefore beginning her postdoc. She has one more year before expiration of the<br \/>\ngrant that supports her work. She has gained a thorough understanding of her<br \/>\nproblem, but the facts she has gathered do not support the working hypothesis of<br \/>\nthe lab. With time growing short, she is reluctant to admit her uncertainty to her<br \/>\nadviser.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comment: <\/strong>An alert adviser would be aware of Susan\u2019s findings and initiate discussions<br \/>\nwith her, inviting her to a strategy session. The adviser has already<br \/>\nlearned, probably through hard personal experience, that research seldom follows<br \/>\na straight line. Good communication and mutual trust can allow the adviser to<br \/>\nundertake an honest appraisal of both Susan\u2019s work and the other work in the lab<br \/>\nin order to decide whether or not the working hypothesis requires modification<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 National Academy of Sciences.\u00a0 All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><em><div class=\"bu_collapsible_container \" aria-live=\"polite\" data-customize-animation=\"false\"><h3 class=\"bu_collapsible\" aria-expanded=\"false\"tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\">Adding New Research Tools<\/h3><div class=\"bu_collapsible_section\" style=\"display: none;\"><\/em><\/p>\n<p>After completing his PhD in computational mathematics, Steven was admitted<br \/>\nto a prestigious new program in bioinformatics at a university. He had never formally<br \/>\nstudied the life sciences, but he was assured that his contribution would be<br \/>\nwelcome because of his strength in mathematics. After six months in his new<br \/>\nposition, however, he was frustrated by his inability to follow the reasoning of his<br \/>\nbiological colleagues. His adviser sensed Steven\u2019s frustration and suggested a<br \/>\none-semester immersion in selected biology courses. After some hesitation,<br \/>\nbecause of fear of harming his standing with the group, Steven accepted the<br \/>\nadvice, and later rejoined the group with renewed confidence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comment: <\/strong>Much exciting research takes place at the intersections of disciplines,<br \/>\nbut interdisciplinary work places heavy demands on researchers on both \u201csides\u201d of<br \/>\nan intersection. More than superficial knowledge of the complementary field may<br \/>\nbe required for productive collaboration. A flexible adviser may find that encouraging<br \/>\nadditional study for certain postdocs can advance both the postdoc\u2019s work and<br \/>\nthe adviser\u2019s program.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 National Academy of Sciences.\u00a0 All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><em><div class=\"bu_collapsible_container \" aria-live=\"polite\" data-customize-animation=\"false\"><h3 class=\"bu_collapsible\" aria-expanded=\"false\"tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\">Learning to Collaborate<\/h3><div class=\"bu_collapsible_section\" style=\"display: none;\"><br \/>\n<\/em><br \/>\nLee is a brilliant but shy student who earned a postdoctoral appointment in<br \/>\nchemistry at a research university. Her strengths at the bench were undeniable,<br \/>\nand she quickly won the confidence of her adviser. After two years of work, however,<br \/>\nLee had made few friends outside the lab, and her work was progressing<br \/>\nmore slowly than expected. Her adviser surprised Lee by asking her to mentor two<br \/>\ngraduate students who had just joined the lab. Lee balked at this request, but the<br \/>\nadviser insisted. The adviser also paid for Lee\u2019s travel to a professional meeting<br \/>\nand arranged for her to present a poster. Several months later, Lee formed a small<br \/>\njournal club around the two students; a month after that, she began a research<br \/>\ncollaboration with a postdoc she met at the meeting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comment: <\/strong>Research is increasingly collaborative, and the performance of successful<br \/>\nresearch depends heavily on interacting with others. The adviser had the<br \/>\nwisdom to see that Lee was blocked by her reticence and to insist (at the risk of<br \/>\njeopardizing her good relationship with Lee) that she begin to develop contacts<br \/>\nand activities outside the lab.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 National Academy of Sciences.\u00a0 All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><em><div class=\"bu_collapsible_container \" aria-live=\"polite\" data-customize-animation=\"false\"><h3 class=\"bu_collapsible\" aria-expanded=\"false\"tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\">Knowing When to Suggest a Change<\/h3><div class=\"bu_collapsible_section\" style=\"display: none;\"><br \/>\n<\/em><br \/>\nDr. Brown accepted Carl for a postdoctoral appointment in his theoretical physics<br \/>\ngroup after a telephoned recommendation from a colleague and a brief meeting<br \/>\nwith Carl. He was impressed by Carl\u2019s enthusiasm for physics and his eloquence<br \/>\nin describing several goals in cosmology. After a few months of work, it was apparent<br \/>\nthat Carl enjoyed his work and was progressing. He requested time to teach an<br \/>\nundergraduate course as well. Dr. Brown agreed with some reluctance, needing all<br \/>\nthe help he could get with the research lab. At his year-end review, Carl told<br \/>\nDr. Brown that he enjoyed his teaching as much as his research, and hoped to<br \/>\nmake teaching a major emphasis in his career. Dr. Brown suggested a minor<br \/>\ncourse change toward a career at a four-year teaching college.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comment: <\/strong>This turned out to be a good move. Carl could continue his research<br \/>\nand teach in an environment where both activities were valued. Through good<br \/>\ncommunication, Carl was able to express his preference to an adviser for whom<br \/>\nteaching was not the first priority, and the adviser had the sensitivity to see that<br \/>\nCarl\u2019s talents could be more fully applied in a different kind of career. Advisers<br \/>\nmust often base their acceptance of a postdoc on a brief impression or the opinion<br \/>\nof others. Mismatches do occur, and although they may be painful to acknowledge,<br \/>\nthe best course of action may involve a change. More painful is the potential<br \/>\nwaste of productive years, which for some PhDs are better spent in non-research<br \/>\nactivities.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 National Academy of Sciences.\u00a0 All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p><em><div class=\"bu_collapsible_container \" aria-live=\"polite\" data-customize-animation=\"false\"><h3 class=\"bu_collapsible\" aria-expanded=\"false\"tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\">Turning Research into Manuscripts<\/h3><div class=\"bu_collapsible_section\" style=\"display: none;\"><\/em><\/p>\n<p>After two productive years as a postdoc at a national laboratory, Paul had<br \/>\ngathered an impressive body of data on climate change resulting from the eruption<br \/>\nof an ancient volcano. His well-planned fieldwork had led to numerous poster<br \/>\nsessions and several hundred pages of unpublished notes, but no publications.<br \/>\nWhen his adviser urged him to publish, Paul responded that he needed a few more<br \/>\ndata points. After a more extended talk, the adviser learned that Paul, despite his<br \/>\nexcellent work, was inhibited by the recent work of a competitor, whom he was<br \/>\ndetermined to \u201cblow out of the water.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Comment: <\/strong>The adviser persuaded Paul to begin publishing after explaining that<br \/>\n1) research accomplishments usually occur in small steps, 2) the feedback from<br \/>\nhis colleagues after publication is essential to further steps, and 3) his career would<br \/>\nstall unless he communicated his work in public. Few junior investigators have a<br \/>\nbasis for understanding when and how much to publish; they need the advice of<br \/>\nexperienced mentors.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 National Academy of Sciences.\u00a0 All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":4137,"featured_media":0,"parent":5393,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10026"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4137"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10026"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10026\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38279,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10026\/revisions\/38279"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5393"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/gms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}