{"id":94656,"date":"2021-05-24T15:30:19","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T19:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/busm\/?p=94656"},"modified":"2021-05-24T15:30:19","modified_gmt":"2021-05-24T19:30:19","slug":"researchers-use-artificial-intelligence-to-determine-extent-of-damage-in-kidney-disease","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/2021\/05\/24\/researchers-use-artificial-intelligence-to-determine-extent-of-damage-in-kidney-disease\/","title":{"rendered":"Researchers Use Artificial Intelligence to Determine Extent of Damage  in Kidney Disease"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is caused by diabetes and hypertension. In 2017, the global prevalence of CKD was 9.1 percent, which is approximately 700 million cases. Chronic kidney damage is assessed by scoring the amount of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) in a renal biopsy sample. Although image digitization and morphometric (measuring external shapes and dimensions) techniques can better quantify the extent of histologic damage, a more widely applicable way to stratify kidney disease severity is needed.<\/p>\n<p>Now, BUSM researchers have developed a novel Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool to predict the grade of IFTA, a known structural correlate of progressive and chronic kidney disease.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHaving a computer model that can mimic an expert pathologist\u2019s workflow and assess disease grade is an exciting idea because this technology has the potential to increase efficiency in clinical practices,\u201d explained corresponding author explained corresponding author Vijaya B. Kolachalama, PhD, assistant professor of medicine.<\/p>\n<p>Typical workflow by the pathologist on the microscope involves manual operations such as panning as well as zooming in and out of specific regions on the slide to evaluate various aspects of the pathology. In the \u2018zoom out\u2019 assessment, pathologists review the entire slide and perform \u2018global\u2019 evaluation of the kidney core. In the \u2018zoom in\u2019 assessment, they perform in-depth, microscopic evaluation of \u2018local\u2019 pathology in the regions of interest.<\/p>\n<p>An international team of five practicing nephropathologists independently determined IFTA scores on the same set of digitized human kidney biopsies using a web-based software (PixelView, deepPath Inc.). Their average scores were taken as a reference estimate to build the deep learning model. To emulate the nephropathologist\u2019s approach to grading the biopsy slides under a microscope, the researchers used AI to incorporate patterns and features from sub-regions (or patches) of the digitized kidney biopsy image as well as the entire (global) digitized image to quantify the extent of IFTA. Through this combination of patch-level and global-level data, a deep learning model was designed to accurately predict IFTA grade.<\/p>\n<p>When validated, Kolachalama believes AI models that can automatically score the extent of chronic damage in the kidney can serve as second opinion tools in clinical practices. \u201cEventually, it may be possible to use this algorithm to study other organ-specific pathologies focused on evaluating fibrosis. Such methods may hold the potential to give more reproducible IFTA readings than readings by nephropathologists,\u201d he adds.<\/p>\n<p>These findings appear <a href=\"https:\/\/ajp.amjpathol.org\/article\/S0002-9440(21)00208-X\/fulltext\">online<\/a> in the <em>American Journal of Pathology<\/em>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Funding for this study was provided in part by the Karen Toffler Charitable trust, the American Heart Association (17SDG33670323 &amp; 20SFRN35460031), the Hariri Institute for Computing and Computational Science &amp; Engineering and Digital Health Initiative at Boston University and the National Institutes of Health (R21-CA253498) to VBK.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eventually AI models that can automatically score the extent of chronic damage in the kidney may be able to serve as second opinion tools in clinical practices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":903,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[91,90],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94656"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/903"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94656"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94656\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":94658,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94656\/revisions\/94658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bumc.bu.edu\/camed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}